ACCIS-ing Chess in a Critical Thinking Rich Classroom
This summer I have been working with high school chess coaches and players in Chicago, helping them apply their expertise in the game to their teaching and learning, respectively. This work is part of Argument-Centered Education’s Academic Competitions Classroom Infusion Series (ACCIS), outlined in a prior Debatifier post. This post is devoted to two of the larger set of resources that we developed together, applying the underlying academic components of chess to regular classroom teaching and learning in the core subjects, in a manner very parallel to the way that Argument-Centered Education has brought academic debate into regular classroom instruction by distilling the essential its components and infusing them throughout the school day.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Taxonomy and Argumentation
Having Kittens, Exponential Growth, and Evaluative Arguments
Argument-Centered Education works to argumentalize curriculum that teachers and schools are committed to teaching and using. We approach our work this way because on the basis of two fundamental convictions.
Capacity and expertise transfer is best done from the inside, not the outside
We aim to build teachers’ and schools’ permanent capacity to organize their own instruction around critical thinking and argument. Curriculum that gets imported into schools is often unused after an initiative is offer. And even if it continues to be used, it can be compartmentlized as the “critical thinking resource” or the “argument project.” Working with teachers’ own curriculum illustrates in the most resonant way for teachers who argument can be integrated throughout their practice.
Argument-Based Math Talks
Overview
Math Talks have become a go-to routine for many math teachers in their response to the new wave of math standards that call for a much greater emphasis on requiring students to justify their solutions, to communicate their mathematical reasoning, to make arguments with math, and to think critically about the mathematical reasoning and arguments of others.
Should High School Students Be Required to Take Algebra? Debating the Matter in Class Using SPontaneous ARgumentation
A debate has broken out over the past few years in (and beyond) education circles over whether algebra should be a high school graduation requirement. The controversy in its current iteration was fueled when the Common Core elevated algebra to a privileged position in secondary math education. Then Secretary of Education Arne Duncan made the case for the standards’ commitment to algebra in a 2011 speech to the National Council of the Teachers of Mathematics.
In recent years, it has become increasingly clear to the country — not just to you guys as teachers — that algebra is a key, maybe the key, to success in college. Students who have completed Algebra II in high school are twice as likely to earn a degree as those who didn’t. Algebra teaches students reasoning and logic leading to academic success not just in math but across the curriculum.