Dismantling Racially-Motivated Arguments for Exclusion
Oedipal Arguments
Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex is arguably where Western literature begins. First performed in 439 BCE, and cited repeatedly in Aristotle’s Poetics for its exemplary features of poetic drama, the play functions in our literary tradition as a kind of ghostly template — certainly over the stage, but over all that can be called tragic narrative too — faintly echoing behind globalized civilization’s literary arts. In light of this status, we’d want to be sure we can argumentalize a unit on Oedipus Rex, right?
ACCIS-ing Chess in a Critical Thinking Rich Classroom
This summer I have been working with high school chess coaches and players in Chicago, helping them apply their expertise in the game to their teaching and learning, respectively. This work is part of Argument-Centered Education’s Academic Competitions Classroom Infusion Series (ACCIS), outlined in a prior Debatifier post. This post is devoted to two of the larger set of resources that we developed together, applying the underlying academic components of chess to regular classroom teaching and learning in the core subjects, in a manner very parallel to the way that Argument-Centered Education has brought academic debate into regular classroom instruction by distilling the essential its components and infusing them throughout the school day.
Exercising Response and Refutation in Interpreting ‘Interpretater of Maladies’
The Bengali-born American writer Jhumpa Lahiri burst on the literary scene with her first collection of short stories, Interpreter of Maladies, published in 1999, when Lahiri was in her early 30s. The collection, which gathers stories published in The New Yorker and less prominent literary magazines, has sold 15 million copies worldwide, and won the 2000 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, as well as the Hemingway/PEN Award. Lahiri launched a literary career with this masterful collection in which she has both been very widely read and very highly lauded. Among other honors, she was named by President Obama in 2010 to the Committee on Arts and Letters, a position she resigned in 2017 to protest President Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric
AWE-some Reasoning Through Interpretive Arguments on ‘Caramelo’
Sandra Cisneros is a staple in high school and middle school reading lists, but not for Caramelo. The House on Mango Street (1984), Cisneros’ short and powerful story collection, is well known and well loved for good reasons. One of them is its austere, rather journalistic and plain-spoken prose style. Caramelo is its very under-read and under-assigned opposite in many ways. This 2002 epic novel tells the multi-generational story of the Mexican-American Reyes family, through the eyes of its adolescent, sensitive, wry protagonist, Ceyla Reyes. Despite its 500+ page length, it is very well worth looking into as an engaging achievement of Latino literature, workable in many high school English reading lists.